Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kompas News Sukabumi program is one of information program in Kompas TV Sukabumi. This program presents phenomena and events around Sukabumi with detail discussed. Kompas News Program participated in introducing government programs, tours and Sukabumi Culture. Depth information about Sukabumi that was not on aired on other national television media become one of program character. Sometimes, the producer is not present for production program, but it does not become an obstacle for Kompas News Sukabumi to broadcast and this program has periods schedule such as program that exist on national television with limited human resources. Showed 7-9 news in a day, one of news content Kompas News program about Curug Awang as Niagara Mini in Canada become reference of candidate for Sukabumi leader to used as campaign tactics. The management carried out in a very long production process more efficient and can be done by 2 people only. The research aims to find out planning, organizing, actuating and controllong production Kompas News Sukabumi program. The research uses concept of Goerge R. Terry (Athoillah, 2010 : 96) about four management function : (1) Planning, (2) Organizing, (3) Actuating and (4) Controlling. This research used case study method with descriptive analysis. Collection data research from interview and observation result. The result of research planning production Kompas news program is the first step by all the crew involved in the program production to decide what to do, what steps to be done and who will be involved. Planning program production begins by discussing about issues planning, organizing planning, video planning and technique planning. Organizing program production is choose and decide who is doing the production process. Organizing program production begins by dividing the task temporarily and fixed. Actuating program production started from description all of crew and ending production with controlling. Controlling program production is control the production process to fit the plan. Controlling production divided by direct supervision, indirect supervision and evaluation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".