Irreducible Dislocation of the Radial Head Associated With Pediatric Monteggia Lesions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In pediatric patients with Monteggia lesions, the radial head can be reduced manually when displacement of the fractured ulna is corrected. Occasionally, however, a dislocated radial head could not be reduced manually even when the length and/or angulation of the fractured ulna had been corrected. We can find such cases in the literature, but those are single case reports. We encountered 17 cases of irreducible dislocation of the radial head in pediatric Monteggia lesions during the past 43 years. The purposes of this study were to identify the characteristics of our cases and to discuss the factors that inhibited reduction of the radial head. METHODS: Of 109 children treated for Monteggia lesions between 1972 and 2015, we encountered 17 cases of irreducible dislocation of the radial head. The patients' ages averaged 7.1 years, ranging from 2.6 to 12.1 years. Directions of the radial head dislocation were anterior in five cases, anteromedial in four, lateral in one, and anterolateral in seven. Most of the patients were referred to us from local orthopaedic clinics because of irreducibility of the radial head. We reduced the radial head surgically and confirmed the causes of irreducibility. RESULTS: In 10 of the 17 cases, the problem was identified as pseudoreduction. In those cases, the radial head was reduced in a supination position but redisplaced in a pronation position. Causes of irreducibility were traced to the annular ligament in 15 cases, biceps tendon in 1, and posterior interosseous nerve in 1. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of pediatric Monteggia lesions, we should pay attention to patients in whom the dislocated radial head is not reduced after closed reduction. The most frequent cause of hindered reduction was interposition of the annular ligament in the radiocapitellar joint. Here, the radial head seems to be reduced in the supination position but becomes redisplaced in the pronation position. After closed reduction, it is important to confirm whether the radial head is stable in both pronation and supination positions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".