Combination Treatment of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Ablative Fractional Laser for Hypertrophic Scars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertrophic scars are defined as visible and elevated scars that do not spread into the surrounding tissues and often regress spontaneously. They can be itchy, painful, and erythematous, so it is a challenging problem for doctors to manage them. This is because hypertrophic scars are caused by the proliferation of dermal tissue and the excessive accumulation of collagen, long-lasting inflammation, and fibrosis. Triamcinolone acetonide was used because it reduces the collagen and inflammatory process. A fractional laser was also used to flatten the overgrown tissues. Four patients who were treated with triamcinolone acetonide and fractional laser to treat a hypertrophic scar were included retrospectively. All patients were injected with triamcinolone acetonide and fractional laser simultaneously. The results were evaluated every session using the Vancouver Scar scale (VSS) and all patients were asked to express a 4-point subjective scale of satisfaction. Measuring the wound with photographs, the VSS score showed improvement over time. The average VSS score of pretreatment and posttreatment was 12 and 4, respectively. The average number of treatments was 12.75, and the average interval of treatments was 5. Using a patient satisfaction scale, the patients were satisfied (Poor: 0%, Fair: 25%, Good: 50%, Excellent: 25%). No significant adverse effects and complications were encountered. The simultaneous treatment using triamcinolone acetonide and fractional laser can be an effective treatment modality for treating hypertrophic scars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".