MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910017535 · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.00937

USE OF REMOTE SENSING ESTIMATES OF NO2 AND PM2.5 EXPOSURE IN A STUDY OF HOSPITAL AND EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS IN ONTARIO, CANADA

2011· article· en· W2910017535 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nina A. Dobbin, Andrew Davidson, Sabit Cakmark, Liu Sun, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok N. Lamsal, Markey Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityDalhousie UniversityHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental healthResidenceEmergency departmentAir pollutionAsthmaEnvironmental scienceMedical emergencyEmergency medicineDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Remote sensing (RS) offers an alternative to ground based air pollution monitoring that provides broad, cost-effective coverage. However, the use of RS estimates in epidemiological studies has not been thoroughly studied, especially for acute health effects. We examine the use of RS to estimate exposure in a case-crossover study of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and asthma hospital visits in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Daily estimates of NO2 and PM2.5 levels were developed by combining retrievals from the OMI, MODIS and MISR instruments with daily profiles from a chemical transport model for the summer of 2005 (June-September). For comparison, ground-based measurements were obtained from Environment Canada’s National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) network. Hospitalization and emergency room visit data, including individual level data on main cause of admission/visit (ICD-10 code), age, sex, and three-digit postal code of home residence, were obtained from databases maintained by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Individual exposure was estimated by linkage of residential postal code centroid to the RS estimate (at approximately 10 km resolution) and the nearest NAPS station within 40km. We will use a case-crossover analysis with full-stratum bidirectional control selection as well as a sensitivity analysis with two-week bidirectional control selection to examine the acute health effects of air pollution exposure as estimated by both RS and ground-based methods. Results: There were 7,562 hospitalizations for MI and 26,962 emergency room visits for asthma in Ontario in the summer of 2005. Preliminary analyses show RS estimates were available for PM2.5 on 36% of days and for NO2 on 24% of days over this time period. RS estimates of PM2.5 were highly correlated with daily-average ground-based NAPS measurements (r=0.73), while daily NO2 measurements were moderately correlated (r=0.48). Conclusions: RS estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 are well correlated with ground-based measurements and offer a promising alternative for estimating exposure in a study of acute health effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207