Super-plasmonic cavity resonances in arrays of flat metallic nanoantennas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We show that when flat strip-like metallic nanoantennas are arranged in a one-dimensional array, coupling of their edge modes can lead to the formation of a super-plasmonic cavity resonance. Such a resonance is extended along the whole array and is characterized by anomalously high order standing waves in each nanoantenna. The super-plasmonic resonance is generated when the nanoantennas are close to each other along their long axes, forming a one-dimensional periodic gap array. When the incident light is polarized along the short axes of these nanoantennas (transverse polarization), at a certain wavelength, the edge modes of the neighboring nanoantennas are coupled to each other through routes that encircle the gaps. The super-plasmonic resonance occurs as such a process enforces a significantly high order collective mode which is not supported by isolated metallic nanoantennas. We demonstrate that when such an array is utilized as a unit cell in a lattice, the coherent light scattering between these cells can enhance such a resonance while forming a unique surface lattice mode with a sharp optical feature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it