MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910307207 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-115743

FOXM1 and the NPM-ALK/STAT3 Axis Form a Novel Positive Feedback Loop in Promoting the Oncogenesis of ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

2018· article· en· W2910307207 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peng Wang, Moinul Haque, Jing Li, Yung-Hsing Huang, Meaad Almowaled, Carter Bargar, Adam R. Karpf, Will Chen, Suzanne D. Turner, Raymond Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFOXO transcription factor regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXM1Anaplastic large-cell lymphomaCancer researchAnaplastic lymphoma kinaseCarcinogenesisLymphomaBiologyMedicineCancerCell cycleOncologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Peng Wang1, Moinul Haque2, Jing Li2,3, Yung-Hsing Huang2, Meaad Almowaled2, Carter Bargar4, Adam Karpf4, Will Chen2, Suzanne Turner5 and Raymond Lai2,6 1Division of Hematology, Dept of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada; 3Electron Microscopy Center, Basic Medical Science College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; 4Eppley Institute and Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA; 5Division of Cellular and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;6Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 1. Backgrounds and Aims Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) is a transcription factor implicated in the pathogenesis of solid tumors, and it has been shown to promote cell-cycle progression, stem cell renewal and chemotherapeutic resistance in cancer cells. Nonetheless, the biological significance of FOXM1 in hematologic malignancies has not been extensively studied. Here, we studied the expression and role of FOXM1 in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ALCL). 2 Methods and Results In contrast with normal lymphocytes, FOXM1 was highly expressed in all ALK+ALCL cell lines (5/5), tumors from patients (6/6) and tumors arising from NPM-ALK transgenic mice. Experiments using nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation, immunocytochemistry and reporter assays had provided evidence that FOXM1 is transcriptionally active in ALK+ALCL. Down-regulation of FOXM1 expression using shRNA and a pharmacologic agent (thiostrepton) resulted in a significant reduction in cell growth, colony formation in soft agar and cell-cycle arrest in ALK+ALCL cells. Further studies revealed that the oncogenic potential of FOXM1 is linked to substantial increases in the phosphorylation/activation status of NPM-ALK and STAT3, and the upregulations of a host of cytokines that have been previously shown to activate the NPM-ALK/STAT3 axis, including IGF-1, IL9 and IL21. Using co-immunoprecipitation, we found that NPM-ALK binds to FOXM1 in the nucleus of ALK+ALCL cells. Importantly, the binding of NPM-ALK to FOXM1 promotes the DNA binding ability and transcriptional activity of FOXM1, and functional inhibition of NPM-ALK using crizotinib or depletion of NPM-ALK using siRNA in ALK+ALCL cells significantly decreased the transcriptional activity of FOXM1.Conclusions: In conclusion, we have identified a novel oncogenic feedback loop involving FOXM1 and the NPM-ALK/STAT3 axis in ALK+ALCL. This study has revealed the first clear example in which NPM-ALK exerts important oncogenic functions in the nuclei of ALK+ALCL cells, by means of its binding to an oncogenic transcription factor so as to promote its DNA binding and transcription activity. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicFOXO transcription factor regulationFrench-language works237,207