MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910312205 · doi:10.1109/nics.2018.8606878

Deep Learning-based Multiple Objects Detection and Tracking System for Socially Aware Mobile Robot Navigation Framework

2018· article· en· W2910312205 on OpenAlexaff
Do Nam Thang, Lan Anh Nguyen, Pham Trung Dung, Truong Dang Khoa, Nguyen Huu Son, Nguyễn Trần Hiệp, Pham Van Nguyen, Vu Duc Truong, Dinh Hong Toan, Trung-Dung Ngo, Xuan Tung Truong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMobile robotComputer visionConvolutional neural networkMobile robot navigationObject detectionDeep learningRobotTracking systemService robotSocial robotRobot controlPattern recognition (psychology)Kalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple objects (including humans) detection and tracking system plays an essential role in socially aware mobile robot navigation framework. Because, it provides an important input for the remaining modules of the framework. In this paper, we propose an efficient multiple objects detection and tracking system for mobile service robots in dynamic social environments using deep learning techniques. The proposed system consists of two steps: (1) multiple objects detection, and (2) multiple objects tracking. In the first step, the RGB image-based multiple objects detection is made use of to detect objects in the mobile robot's vicinity using a convolutional neural network. In the second stage of system, the detected objects are tracked using a deep simple online and realtime tracking technique. The experimental results indicate that, the proposed system is capable of detecting and tracking multiple objects including humans, providing significant information for the socially aware mobile robot navigation framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207