MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910313575 · doi:10.1515/phys-2018-0103

Elastic properties and plane acoustic velocity of cubic Sr2CaMoO6 and Sr2CaWO6 from first-principles calculations

2018· article· en· W2910313575 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyuan Jia, Peida Wang, Willie Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDebye modelBulk modulusShear modulusAnisotropyPlane waveLattice constantPhysicsCondensed matter physicsCubic crystal systemDensity functional theoryPlane (geometry)ModulusMaterials scienceDiffractionGeometryThermodynamicsOpticsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The elastic properties and plane acoustic velocity of double perovskite Sr2CaMoO6 and Sr2CaWO6 are investigated with the plane wave pseuedopotential method based on the first-principles density functional theory within the local density approximate (LDA) and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The calculations indicate that Sr2CaMoO6 and Sr2CaWO6 respectively have the the Mo-O and W-O stable octahedral structure. The bulk modulus B, shear modulus G, Young’s modulus E, Poisson’s ratio ν and Debye temperature were calculated based on the elastic constants. The three dimensional plane acoustic velocities and their projection are in calculated for each direction by solving the Christoffel’s equation systematically based on the theory of acoustic waves in anisotropic solids, the result shows of anisotropy of lattice vibration for Sr2CaMoO6 is stronger than Sr2CaWO6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen PhysicsSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207