MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910490479 · doi:10.1002/hep4.1307

Effectiveness of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir and Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in People Who Inject Drugs and/or Those in Opioid Agonist Therapy

2019· article· en· W2910490479 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Naveed Z. Janjua, Maryam Darvishian, Stanley Wong, Amanda Yu, Carmine Rossi, Alnoor Ramji, Eric M. Yoshida, Zahid A Butt, Hasina Samji, Mei Chong, N. Chapinal, Darrel Cook, Maria Alvarez, Mark Tyndall, Mel Krajden

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlProvincial Health Services AuthorityMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Cancer AgencyCelgeneGilead SciencesBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsSofosbuvirMedicineLedipasvirAgonistPharmacologyInternal medicineVirologyHepatitis C virusReceptorRibavirinVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated the effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and SOF/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for all genotypes among people who inject drugs (PWID) and those not injecting drugs and who were on or off opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Study participants comprised a population‐based cohort in British Columbia, Canada. The British Columbia Hepatitis Testers Cohort includes data on individuals tested for HCV from 1990 to 2016 that are integrated with medical visits, hospitalization, and prescription drug data. We classified study participants as off OAT/recent injection drug use (off‐OAT/RIDU), off OAT/past IDU (off‐OAT/PIDU), off OAT/no IDU (off‐OAT/NIDU), on OAT/IDU (on‐OAT/IDU), and on OAT/no IDU (on‐OAT/NIDU). We assessed sustained virologic response (SVR) 10 weeks after HCV treatment among study groups treated with LDV/SOF or SOF/VEL until January 13, 2018. Analysis included 5,283 eligible participants: 390 off‐OAT/RIDU, 598 off‐OAT/PIDU, 3,515 off‐OAT/NIDU, 609 on‐OAT/IDU, and 171 on‐OAT/NIDU. The majority were male patients (64%‐74%) and aged ≥50 years (58%‐85%). The SVRs for off‐OAT/RIDU, off‐OAT/PIDU, off‐OAT/NIDU, on‐OAT/IDU, and on‐OAT/NIDU were 91% (355/390), 95% (570/598), 96% (3,360/3,515), 93% (567/609), and 95% (163/171), respectively. Among those with no SVR, 14 individuals died while on treatment or before SVR assessment, including 4 from illicit drug overdose. In the overall multivariable model, off‐OAT/RIDU, on‐OAT/IDU, male sex, cirrhosis, treatment duration <8 weeks, treatment duration 8 weeks, and treatment with SOF/VEL were associated with not achieving SVR. Conclusion: In this large real‐world cohort, PWID and/or those on OAT achieved high SVRs, although slightly lower than people not injecting drugs. This finding also highlights the need for additional measures to prevent loss to follow‐up and overdose‐related deaths among PWID.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatology CommunicationsSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207