Protein fractionation of <i>Moringa oleifera</i> Lam. seeds and functionalization with magnetic particles for the treatment of reactive black 5 solution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Industrial effluents are sewage from industrial processes, such as polluted cooling waters and waters used for cleaning. It is extremely important that these contaminated waters undergo treatment to allow for water reuse or safe disposal, without damage to the environment. In the present work, the efficacy of coagulating/flocculating aqueous solutions containing reactive black 5 (RB5) dye was evaluated using protein fractions derived from Moringa oleifera seeds (albumin and globulin) as natural coagulants functionalized with iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. The application of a magnetic field during sedimentation allowed for faster settlement of the dye particles and their separation. Variations in parameters such as the protein concentration, nanoparticle concentration, solution pH, dye concentration, and the presence or absence of an alkalizing agent were assessed. Moreover, the sedimentation time was analyzed with and without the magnetic field and with the reuse of iron oxide nanoparticles. The functionalized magnetic coagulants were able to remove more than 90 % of RB5 dye within 5 min of sedimentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it