MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910814966 · doi:10.4095/221038

In situ stresses in the Mallik area

2005· report· en· W2910814966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situGeologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The orientations of the principal horizontal in situ stresses, OHmin and OHmax, were analyzedi n the Mallik area by investigating the local structural geology, regional borehole breakouts, drilling- induced fractures, borehole ellipticity, and shear-wave-velocity anisotropy. Vertical-stress magnitudes in the Mallik area were evaluated by analyzing historical and recently acquired core and log bulk-density data. Minimum magnitudes of horizontal in situ stress (OHmin) were estimated using data from deeper industry leak-off tests on wells within 70 km of the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al.Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production researchwell and a profile of microfracture stress tests conducted in the Mallik 5L-38 well with Schlumberger's Modular Dynamics Tester (MDT)TM. The microfracture tests do not show classic hydraulic-fracture-breakdown pressures, and there are several indications of the influence of natural fractures on the induced-fracture- propagation and closure pressures. The data suggest the existence of nearly isotropic, low-magnitude, horizontal in situ stresses in the gas-hydrate-bearing intervals in the Mallik 5L-38 well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it