Efficacy of two brief cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs for chronic neck pain: results of a randomized controlled pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current models of pain behavior suggest that kinesiophobia prevents the reacquisition of normal function, promotes the development of maladaptive coping strategies, and contributes to the disability associated with chronic neck pain (NP). AIM: Comparing two brief cognitive-behavioral programs aimed at managing kinesiophobia to understand which one induces better short-term improvements in disability, fear of movement, catastrophizing, adaptive coping strategies, quality of life (QoL), and pain intensity of chronic NP. DESIGN: Pilot, randomized, controlled trial, 3-months follow-up. SETTING: Outpatients. POPULATION: Subjects with chronic NP. METHODS: The population was randomized into two groups: group A (N.=15) underwent four sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) based on the NeckPix© (1-week duration); group B (N.=15) received four sessions of CBT based on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) (1-week duration). Afterwards, both groups attended 10 sessions of multimodal exercises (5-week duration). Primary measure: Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary measures: NeckPix©, TSK, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, EuroQol-Five Dimensions, and pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale. STATISTICS: Linear mixed model analyses for repeated measures for each outcome measure to evaluate changes over time and between group. RESULTS: A significant effect of time was found for all outcomes, while no outcomes showed group and/or interaction effects. No changes were found in terms of NDI at the end of CBT, while a significant improvement of about 13 points was found for both groups at the end of the motor training (P=0.001). Similarly, in terms of quality of life there was no change after the CBT program, and a significant change at the end of the motor training, with a partial loss at follow-up. From CBT sessions to follow-up both groups showed a progressive reduction in kinesiophobia, with each group achieving a bigger change in the specific scale used for the CBT program. CONCLUSIONS: Two brief cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs based on different methodologies of managing fear-avoidance beliefs induced similar short-term improvements in subjects with chronic NP. Clinically significant changes in terms of disability were found in both groups only at the end of a 5-week motor training, regardless of the cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation program previously administrated. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Treatment of chronic NP requires cognitive modifications closely linked to physical performances in order to achieve mental adjustments and guarantee cognitive-behavioral as well as motor lasting changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".