A New Gosper Island Fractal UWB Monopole Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new CPW-fed Gosper island UWB monopole antenna is proposed. The fractal layout provides a better response in terms of bandwidth compared to the response of a standard hexagonal broadband antenna. The hexagonal layout presents the building block (first iteration) of the proposed antenna. The| S11| in dB satisfies the 10 dB criterion from 3.1 GHz to 10.9 GHz. A monopole-like radiation pattern is achieved and acceptable gain values along the operational bandwidth are obtained. The efficiency of the antenna is considered high with a maximum value of 89.6 0/0. Moreover, a notching fractal arm is attached to the radiating part of the antenna to provide a notching band between 4 GHz and 4.3 GHz. The center of the notching band value is inversely proportional to the length of the fractal arm. The proposed antenna can be scaled to operate at different broadband frequency ranges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".