MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910897751

Light Rail Transit in the Region of Waterloo: A qualitative examination of urban rail’s effects on real estate, development and urban identities

2019· dissertation· en· W2910897751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Justin Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLight rail transitTransport engineeringReal estateLight railReal estate developmentUrban rail transitRegional scienceGeographyEconomic geographyCivil engineeringEngineeringPublic transportBusinessFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transit oriented development has become a staple of contemporary planning practice that is applied in cities throughout the world to help guide the development of sustainable, economic, and social outcomes in urban regions. Widely perceived as a response to automobile centric and urban sprawl inducing design principals of post war planning approaches, transit oriented development is offered as a means of achieving compact urban form that negates many of the issues associated with sprawl. While considerable effort has been undertaken to examine the extent to which transit oriented development affects change on surrounding urban environments, few studies exist that have investigated how social processes interact with transit oriented development to produce the observed effects.
\nThis research uncovers underlying social dynamics and perspectives that shape the potential effectiveness of transit oriented development to restructure Canadian real estate markets, urban and economic development trends, and resident behaviour. A case study of the ION light rail transit project in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario, examines how and why resident perspectives and social dynamics are emerging because of the project and subsequently affecting the Region’s development patterns. Focus groups with real estate agents are presented as the primary data of the thesis, which depict the project as a mechanism for attracting creative class economic development and new residents, resulting in an urban landscape divided between automobile and transit centric communities and lifestyles. Findings show the need to increase the use of qualitative methods in transit oriented development research, as they carry the potential to uncover and explain associated trends. To address sustainability, economic development, and social equity concerns related to TOD, recommendations to enact policies that can offset gentrification and unaffordability trends, promote increased behaviour change amongst heterogeneous and automobile centric populations, and to capitalize on homogeneous population preferences are offered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207