The Phase-Shifting Effect of Bright Light Exposure on Circadian Rhythmicity in the Human Transcriptome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Light is a potent synchronizer of the central circadian clock; however, the effect of light exposure on peripheral gene expression is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of bright light exposure on genome-wide peripheral gene expression levels during a 4-day simulated night shift protocol in which the habitual sleep period is delayed by 10 h. Eleven healthy participants (mean age, 24 years; range, 18-30; 10 men/1 woman) were studied under controlled laboratory conditions. Three participants were exposed to bright light (~6,500 lux) for 8 h during the nightly waking period, while the other 8 were maintained in dim-light conditions (~10 lux). At baseline and on the fourth day after the shift in the sleep period, blood samples were collected during two 24-h measurement periods. RNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and used to obtain transcriptomic data. Using 2 independent approaches to determine phase shifts among rhythmically expressed genes after the shifted sleep schedule compared with baseline, we found that the average phase delay in the bright light group was approximately 8 to 9 h, whereas the average phase delay in the control group was approximately 1 to 2 h, both at the group level and at the individual level. In line with these findings, further analysis using partial least squares regression indicated that the peripheral circadian transcriptome of PBMCs was predictive of the phase of the central circadian pacemaker after only 3 days of bright light exposure. These results indicate that bright light exposure exerts a phase-shifting effect on the circadian transcriptome in PBMCs with a magnitude similar to its effect on the central circadian clock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".