MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911022442 · doi:10.4095/287286

New U-Pb geochronological results from plutonic and sedimentary rocks of Southampton Island, Nunavut

2011· report· en· W2911022442 on OpenAlexaffabout
N M Rayner, J Chakungal, M Sanborn-Barrie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryPlutonSedimentary rockPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hornblende-biotite monzogranite with a crystallization age of 2692 ± 6 Ma and semi-pelite-psammite cut by a peraluminous granite dated at 2682 ± 17 Ma establish the presence of plutonic and supracrustal rocks of Archean age on Southampton Island. A potentially Paleoproterozoic carbonate-quartzite cover sequence has a maximum depositional age of 2615 ± 23 Ma, similar to an epiclastic rock (2599 ± 15 Ma) that differs in provenance profile. A quartz porphyry is dated at 1934 ± 8 Ma, similar in age to charnockite dated at 1931 ± 19 Ma. A sample of gabbroic anorthosite is interpreted to have crystallized at 1870 ± 10 Ma. Regionally extensive, foliated biotite granodiorite is dated at 1852 ± 8 Ma. Archean detritus and inheritance, as old as 3.7 Ga, is common in the aforementioned metasedimentary and plutonic rocks, with the exception of the quartz porphyry. Massive to very weakly foliated monzogranite, dated at 1821.7 ± 2.5 Ma, provides a minimum age on penetrative deformation across Southampton Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207