Effect of vasopressin on a porcine model of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is due to a failure of pulmonary vascular relaxation. Vasopressin, a systemic vasoconstrictor acting on smooth muscle AVPR1a receptors, is used in treatment of PPHN. We sought to determine acute effects of vasopressin infusion on pulmonary hemodynamics in a large animal model of hypoxic PPHN. METHODS: PPHN was induced in 6 newborn piglets by 72 h normobaric hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.10); controls were 7 age-matched 3-day-old piglets. Animals were anesthetized and ventilated with central venous and arterial lines, and after stabilization, randomized using a crossover design to normoxic or hypoxic ventilation, then 30 min infusion of 0.0012 U/kg/min vasopressin, followed by 45 min vasopressin washout period. Echocardiographic parameters and oxygen consumption were measured before and after vasopressin. Relaxation to vasopressin was tested in isolated PPHN and control pulmonary arteries by isometric myography. Expression of AVPR1a receptor mRNA was quantified in arterial and myocardial tissues. RESULTS: Vasopressin did not alleviate hypoxia-responsiveness of PPHN pulmonary circuit. There were no significant differences in pulmonary hypertension, cardiac function indices, or oxygenation indices after vasopressin infusion. Vasopressin did not dilate control or PPHN pulmonary arteries, and AVPR1 was minimally expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin does not have a direct pulmonary vasodilator effect in PPHN, within the timeframe studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".