Partitioned tectonic shortening, with emphasis on outcrop-scale folding and flattening, Pindos fold-and-thrust belt, Peloponnese, Greece
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shortening estimates for fold–thrust belts seldom take into consideration outcrop-scale folding, especially folding related to prethrusting layer-parallel shortening (LPS) and flattening. The Pindos belt of the Peloponnese contains products of Maastrichtian to Paleocene tectonic shortening amenable to assessing strain partitioning. Shortening there initiated with LPS, including outcrop-scale folding, which was superseded by thrusting and macrofolding, with both macromechanisms producing additional outcrop-scale folding and (or) form-modification of initial LPS outcrop-scale folds. Skourlis and Doutsos (2003. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 92: 891–903) concluded that total shortening in this region was 68%, the summation of ∼15% LPS, ∼6% fault-related macrofolding, and ∼47% thrust–slip translation. But even this degree of shortening may be underestimated when outcrop-scale folding is considered. Two limestone-dominated Cretaceous formations and one Cretaceous–Eocene formation of limestone and mudstone display spectacular outcrop-scale folding produced by true multilayer behavior, internal buckling, and disharmonic quasi-flexural folding. Fold forms vary from chevron buckling of multilayers to more rounded folding of true multilayers to disharmonic flattened folds in pseudo-bedded limestone. Ramsay analysis of layer thickness variations across individual disharmonic folds underscores the disharmonic fold forms and intense degree of pressure dissolution generated fold flattening. Line-length shortening for well exposed “packages” of LPS outcrop-scale folding is as high as 30%, but overlying and underlying panels may be more modestly folded and (or) flattened, suggesting that shortening transfer mechanisms may have caused some sections to be bypassed. Achieving more meaningful shortening estimates of the outcrop-scale folding within an entire progressive deformation will require understanding of the partitioning of distribution of this folding regionally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".