MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2911167469 · doi:10.4095/248154

Kimberlite indicator mineral survey and ice flow studies in Boothia mainland (NTS 57A, 57B, 57C and 57D), Kitikmeot region, Nunavut

2009· report· en· W2911167469 on OpenAlexaffabout
T Tremblay, J J Ryan, D T James, I M Kjarsgaard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGlacial periodSnowball EarthGeochemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glacial history studies and analysis of heavy mineral separates from glacial sediments (till and eskers) were undertaken in theBoothia mainland area of central Nunavut. Mapping of surficial macroforms and glacial striae has shown a complex, four phase ice-flow history. From oldest to youngest, the ice-flow history entails: Phase 1 to the north, Phase 2 to the northeast, Phase3 to the east, and Phase 4 to the north. Late-stage, localized ice-flows were determined in some areas, especially around the Harrison Uplands. All of the regional ice-flow phases impacted on the final distribution of glacial erratics in till, but with varied influence, wherein Phase 2 to the NE and Phase 4 to the N in the southern part of Boothia mainland were the most significant glacial dispersal events. During Phase 2, glacial transport distances of greater than 100 km were determined for Paleozoic carbonates and Paleoproterozoic members of the Chantrey Group siliciclastic (pelites, orthoquartzites), and at least 20 km for the Paleoproterozoic marble member of the Chantrey Group. Kimberlite indicator minerals (including mantle ilmenite, forsterite, Cr-diopside, eclogitic and peridotitic (G9) garnets, chromite, perovskite and lyndsleyite) and visual gold grains were found in glacial sediments. Prospective zones for kimberlites or gold mineralization are outlined herein from heavy mineral analysis and knowledge of the ice-flow history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→