Double‐Diffusive Layering in the Canada Basin: An Explanation of Along‐Layer Temperature and Salinity Gradients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Double‐diffusive mixing gives rise to layered structures in the Arctic Ocean: layers within a double‐diffusive staircase overlying deeper layers associated with thermohaline intrusions. These layers exhibit well‐defined lateral temperature and salinity gradients. Gradients in salinity along individual layers change sign with depth, while along‐layer gradients in temperature remain the same sign with depth. A theoretical formalism is put forward to explain these features in terms of vertical divergences of double‐diffusive fluxes; temperature and salinity gradients along layers are set by the depth‐dependent ratio of double‐diffusive heat to salt fluxes. Examination of fine structure in temperature and salinity profiles reveals how the net flux ratio depends upon whether the layer is part of an evolving thermohaline intrusion or a staircase. The physical framework in context with observations of varying along‐layer gradients in temperature and salinity provides evidence for thermohaline intrusions evolving to a staircase and describes the parameters that dictate this process. Results bring new understanding to heat and salt transport in the Arctic Ocean as well as the physics of double‐diffusive layering in the world's oceans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".