MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911306684 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3018(18)30295-9

Contributions of traditional and HIV-related risk factors on non-AIDS-defining cancer, myocardial infarction, and end-stage liver and renal diseases in adults with HIV in the USA and Canada: a collaboration of cohort studies

2019· article· en· W2911306684 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Keri N. Althoff, Kelly A. Gebo, Richard D. Moore, Cynthia M. Boyd, Amy C. Justice, Cherise Wong, Gregory M. Lucas, Marina B. Klein, Mari M. Kitahata, Heidi M. Crane, Michael J. Silverberg, M. John Gill, William C. Mathews, Robert Dubrow, Michael A. Horberg, Charles S. Rabkin, Daniel B. Klein, Vincent Lo Re, Timothy R. Sterling, Fidel Desir, Kenneth Lichtenstein, James H. Willig, Anita Rachlis, Gregory D. Kirk, Kathryn Anastos, Frank J. Palella, Jennifer E. Thorne, Joseph J. Eron, Lisa P. Jacobson, Sonia Napravnik, Chad J. Achenbach, Ángel M. Mayor, Pragna Patel, Kate Buchacz, Yuezhou Jing, Stephen J. Gange

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet HIV · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryHealth Sciences CentreMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Center for Research ResourcesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityJohns Hopkins Center for Mind-Body ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGilead SciencesCanadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineKidney diseasePopulationEnd stage renal diseaseMyocardial infarctionLiver diseaseDiseaseHepatitis CDiabetes mellitusCancerRisk factorStage (stratigraphy)CohortHepatitis BEndocrinologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet HIVSame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207