Bibliographic record
Abstract
The (COOH)2 oxidation reaction was studied at potentials below which the oxygen evolution reaction (oer) takes place. Pt was found to catalyze the (COOH)2 oxidation reaction more strongly than Au, while Ru did not display any activity towards the (COOH)2 oxidation reaction. Furthermore, under rapid stirring conditions, the (COOH)2 oxidation reaction using Pt electrodes was shown to be purely activation controlled. Therefore, the (COOH)2 oxidation currents can be related to the electro-active Pt area, as shown for a range of polycrystalline, bulk metal Pt and Pt powder electrodes. The Pt surface area for multi-component catalyst systems can also be estimated by combining (COOH)2 oxidation data with the charge needed to oxidize adsorbed CO to CO2 (COads charge), as shown for a range of Pt and Ru containing powder electrodes. In fact, the combination of the two methods ((COOH)2 oxidation current and COads charge) can be used as an in-situ probe to estimate the fraction of Ru in the metallic state in the potential region where CO is adsorbed provided that the surface ratio of Pt vs. Ru is known.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".