Evaluation of Susceptibilities to Carbapenems and Faropenem Against Cephalosporin-Resistant <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> Clinical Isolates with <i>penA</i> Mosaic Alleles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a principal pathogen for sexually transmitted infections, especially for male urethritis. Currently, the prevalence of multidrug resistance is increasing. Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antimicrobials that are widely used in the clinical setting, especially for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, susceptibility to carbapenems has not been well evaluated for cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates. In this study, we determined the susceptibility to a series of carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, and biapenem) and faropenem against cephalosporin-resistant (resistant to cefixime, but susceptible to ceftriaxone) and cephalosporin-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae clinical isolates. The gene mutations associated with β-lactam resistance were evaluated. All cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates possessed mosaic mutation alleles in penA (NG-STAR penA-10.001, 27.001, or 108.001). They exhibited a low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (≤0.125 mg/L) for meropenem and markedly high MICs (0.5-2 mg/L) for other carbapenems and faropenem. The strongest association was observed between the mosaic alleles in penA and decreased susceptibility to carbapenems and faropenem compared with mutations in mtrR, porB, and ponA. These results suggest that meropenem may serve as an alternative therapeutic agent for cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae with a mosaic allele in penA, whereas other carbapenems and faropenem may be ineffective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it