L'Effet 11 septembre : 15 ans après
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il y a quinze ans deja, le World Trade Center et le Pentagone etaient la cible d'une attaque terroriste dont le monde subit toujours les consequences. Apres avoir lance la lutte contre Al-qaida et les talibans, renverse le regime de Saddam Hussein et tue Oussama ben Laden, les Etats-Unis restent engages dans une guerre tous azimuts contre le terrorisme. Les attentats de Charlie Hebdo et du 13 novembre 2015 a Paris, ou encore ceux d'octobre 2014 a Ottawa et Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, ont par ailleurs incite des pays comme la France et le Canada a en faire plus pour prevenir de tels evenements. Quinze ans apres le 11 septembre 2001, de quelle maniere le terrorisme a-t-il evolue dans le monde? Est-il aussi menacant qu'on le croit? Justifie-t-il de vivre dans un etat d'alerte, d'exception et de guerre permanent? Avec les contributions de Zoe Barry, Adib Bencherif, Andreanne Bissonnette, Vincent Boucher, Christophe Cloutier, Louis Collerette, Francoise Conea, Frederick Gagnon, William Grenier-Chalifoux, Josselyn Guillarmou, Nicolas Pellerin-Roy, Mylene Repentigny-Corbeil, Maxime Ricard, Julien Tourreille et Elisabeth Vallet. Creee en 1996 et situee a l'Universite du Quebec a Montreal, la Chaire Raoul-Dandurand en etudes strategiques et diplomatiques s'est donne une mission d'analyse, de formation et de diffusion aupres des universites, des organismes d'Etat, des organisations internationales, du secteur prive et de la societe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".