MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911426326 · doi:10.1107/s0108767318095703

New pathways in NMR crystallography: structural refinement and solid-state NMR of the periodic table

2018· article· en· W2911426326 on OpenAlexaff
Robert W. Schurko, Sean T. Holmes, David A. Hirsh, Austin A. Peach, Christopher A. O’Keefe, Jacqueline E. Gemus, Stanislav L. Veinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceCrystallographyTable (database)Solid-stateNuclear magnetic resonance crystallographyChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyFluorine-19 NMRPhysicsPhysical chemistryComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NMR crystallography is an emerging discipline that combines solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods, and computational approaches for the purposes of refining and determining molecular-level structures in a wide array of solids, including crystalline, semi-ordered, and amorphous materials.[1-3]SSNMR can be utilized to provide information on interatomic distances, structural assignments, local atomic/molecular symmetries, and/or characterization of structural disorder; these data, when used in combination with XRD and/or computational methods, can elicit structures that rival those determined by neutron diffraction methods.The majority of modern NMR crystallographic studies rely upon the measurement of chemical shifts (typically from 1 H, 13 C, or 15 N NMR spectra), and comparison to magnetic shielding values of refined structures obtained from plane-wave density functional theory (DFT) calculations.An increasing number of studies have utilized data from numerous NMR-active nuclides across the periodic table, including metal nuclides with large chemical shift anisotropies and quadrupolar nuclides (i.e., nuclear spin > 1/2).Quadrupolar nuclides are of particular interest, since the quadrupolar interactions that influence SSNMR spectra are extremely sensitive to even the smallest structural differences/changes.In this lecture, first, I will present a discussion of NMR crystallographic studies conducted in my group, with a focus on structural refinements aided by 14 N, 17 O, 35 Cl, 111 Cd and 195 Pt solid-state NMR data.These nuclides are can be classified as unreceptive, due to a number of factors, including: (i) low gyromagnetic ratios, (ii) low natural abundance, (iii) large anisotropic interactions that can lead to substantial line broadening, (iv) inconvenient relaxation characteristics, or (v) combinations of these factors.Then, I will discuss some of the methods designed by my group that allow for rapid acquisition of SSNMR spectra crucial for NMR crystallographic studies.[5]Finally, I will outline a powerful method for refining crystal structures that uses dispersion-corrected plane-wave DFT, which relies upon the accurate measurement and computation of electric field gradient (EFG) tensors.[6]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207