MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911493108 · doi:10.1002/humu.23721

A sensitive and scalable microsatellite instability assay to diagnose constitutional mismatch repair deficiency by sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes

2019· article· en· W2911493108 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Gallon, Barbara Mühlegger, Sören-Sebastian Wenzel, Harsh Sheth, Christine Hayes, Stefan Aretz, Karin Dahan, William D. Foulkes, Christian P. Kratz, Tim Ripperger, Amedeo A. Azizi, Hagit Baris Feldman, Anne‐Laure Chong, Uğur Demırsoy, Benoît Florkin, Thomas Imschweiler, Danuta Januszkiewicz‐Lewandowska, Stephan Lobitz, Michaela Nathrath, Hans-Jürgen Pander, Vanesa Pérez‐Alonso, Claudia Perne, Iman Ragab, Thorsten Rosenbaum, Daniel Rueda, Markus G. Seidel, Manon Suerink, Julia Taeubner, Stefanie Zimmermann, Johannes Zschocke, Gillian M. Borthwick, John Burn, Michael S. Jackson, Mauro Santibanez‐Koref, Katharina Wimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
FundersBarbour FoundationKWF KankerbestrijdingNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UK
KeywordsPMS2Microsatellite instabilityMicrosatelliteGenotypingBiologyLynch syndromeDNA mismatch repairGenetic testingCancerGeneticsAlleleGenotypeGeneColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is caused by germline pathogenic variants in both alleles of a mismatch repair gene. Patients have an exceptionally high risk of numerous pediatric malignancies and benefit from surveillance and adjusted treatment. The diversity of its manifestation, and ambiguous genotyping results, particularly from PMS2, can complicate diagnosis and preclude timely patient management. Assessment of low-level microsatellite instability in nonneoplastic tissues can detect CMMRD, but current techniques are laborious or of limited sensitivity. Here, we present a simple, scalable CMMRD diagnostic assay. It uses sequencing and molecular barcodes to detect low-frequency microsatellite variants in peripheral blood leukocytes and classifies samples using variant frequencies. We tested 30 samples from 26 genetically-confirmed CMMRD patients, and samples from 94 controls and 40 Lynch syndrome patients. All samples were correctly classified, except one from a CMMRD patient recovering from aplasia. However, additional samples from this same patient tested positive for CMMRD. The assay also confirmed CMMRD in six suspected patients. The assay is suitable for both rapid CMMRD diagnosis within clinical decision windows and scalable screening of at-risk populations. Its deployment will improve patient care, and better define the prevalence and phenotype of this likely underreported cancer syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207