MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911497535 · doi:10.1080/19440049.2019.1567943

Development of a polyclonal antibody-based indirect competitive ELISA for determination of sterigmatocystin in wheat and corn flours

2019· article· en· W2911497535 on OpenAlexaff
Gurmit Singh, Ligia Velasquez, Anne-Catherine Huet, Philippe Delahaut, Nathalie Gillard, Terry Koerner

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Additives & Contaminants Part A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSterigmatocystinPolyclonal antibodiesChemistryMycotoxinChromatographyFood scienceCoefficient of variationImmunogenAflatoxinImmunoassayMetaboliteDetection limitAntibodyBiologyMonoclonal antibodyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sterigmatocystin (STC) is a toxic secondary metabolite produced by more than 50 fungal species, including Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. nidulans, and A. versicolor. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives concluded that sterigmatocystin is genotoxic and carcinogenic with the critical effect determined to be carcinogenicity. The present study describes a simple method to prepare hapten and immunogens in order to generate polyclonal antibodies against this metabolite. We developed a sensitive and specific polyclonal antibody-based competitive indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ciELISA) for monitoring STC in wheat and corn flours without the need for derivatisation of STC or clean-up of samples by immunoaffinity chromatography for quantification. The half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the established method was 4.52 ± 0.81 ng mL−1, with the limit of detection (IC10) being 0.19 ± 0.04 ng mL−1 in wheat and corn flour matrices with the coefficient of variation of less than 22%.The assay was very specific to STC and showed no cross-reactivity with its analogue structures. The ELISA allowed for up to 5% methanol without significant influence on the IC50 value. Validation of the assay was performed by spiking STC into a blank flour matrix and the recoveries were in the range of 75.3 % to 104.5 % with a coefficient of variation less than 15%. A small retail survey was conducted by purchasing wheat (n = 8) and corn flours (n = 2) from local grocery stores. All of these retail samples were negative for STC using the developed ELISA method and were confirmed by LC-MS/MS. We demonstrated a rapid, simple, and reliable method for screening STC in wheat and corn flours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Additives & Contaminants Part ASame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207