MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911506018 · doi:10.4095/313541

Dimensional modelling of Quaternary deposits in South Simcoe County for groundwater applications

2019· report· en· W2911506018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andy F. Bajc, R P M Mulligan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuaternaryGroundwaterGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of its Groundwater Initiative, the Ontario Geological Survey has constructed a 3-dimensional (3-D) model of Quaternary deposits in South Simcoe County for groundwater applications. A conceptual stratigraphic framework, informed by the recent acquisition of high-quality geological and geophysical data, consists of 15 hydrostratigraphic units overlying Ordovician bedrock. Although the project has resulted in an improved understanding of bedrock topography, details of the bedrock surface including the morphology and origin of the Laurentian valley, remains still debated. The 15 hydrostratigraphic units comprise 3 main groups. These include: 1) an Illinois Episode (or older package), consisting primarily of diamicton, overlain by non-glacial sediments spanning the Sangamon interglacial and earliest part of the Wisconsin Episode; 2) a thick (up to 125 m), Early-Middle Wisconsin transgressive sequence of glaciolacustrine deposits (Scarborough and Thorncliffe Formation equivalents) laid down in a high-level lake bordered by the advancing Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS). Subsequent overriding of the lake basin by the LIS initiated deposition of the Late Wisconsin Newmarket Till which continued during and after multiple phases of tunnel valley erosion; and 3) a mixed package of late glacial and post-glacial gravel, sand, silt and clay associated with the interlobate Oak Ridges Moraine along the southern margin of the study area, kame terrace deposits along the Niagara Escarpment and glaciolacustrine sediments in low-lying areas. The soon to be released 3-D model, with a block size of 100 m, and accompanying Groundwater Resources Study report supplements previously released datasets, including results of geophysical surveys and continuously cored boreholes. These data provide an improved understanding of the distribution, architecture and facies variability of sediments comprising the Quaternary succession for future hydrogeologic modelling exercises. Outputs include an abbreviated version of the subsurface database (including stratigraphic picks) used for the creation of the model, a series of both continuous and discontinuous surfaces for hydrogeologic modelling (available as both ArcGIS and ASCII grids), structural contour and isopach plots with accompanying maps showing the distribution and quality of data used in their generation, and N-S and E-W cross-sections plotted at 2 km intervals using both a hydrostratigraphic legend and a simplified aquifer-aquitard-bedrock scheme. Derivative products include aquifer recharge and vulnerability maps. Much of this information will be viewable in a Google Earth platform for enhanced interactive viewing and interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207