MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Endoscopic and Clinical Efficacy Demonstrated With Oral Ozanimod in Moderately to Severely Active Crohnʼs Disease

2017· article· en· W2911526312 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, William J. Sandborn, Silvio Danese, Geert D’Haens, Barrett G. Levesque, Douglas C. Wolf, Brett E. Skolnick, Caiyan Li, Darryl Penenberg, Richard Aranda, Allan Olson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseAbdominal painUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyColonoscopyDiseaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ozanimod, an oral, once-daily immunomodulator designed to selectively targets S1P1R and S1P5R, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) [1] and is being evaluated in active Crohn's Disease (CD). This Phase 2 open-label study in CD examined endoscopic and clinical outcomes following treatment with ozanimod 1 mg daily for 12 weeks. Methods: Patients with active CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score 220-450, total simple endoscopic score for CD [SES-CD] ≥6 [or in isolated ileum disease SES-CD ≥4]) were dosed with ozanimod 1 mg daily. All endoscopic assessments were read in a blinded manner by an imaging core lab. Daily electronic diary records were used to collect CD symptoms (including abdominal pain and soft/loose stool frequency). SES-CD was evaluated at baseline and Week 12, and CDAI was assessed at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Results: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled. At baseline, mean age was 37.7 years, mean SES-CD was 13.3, and mean CDAI was 320. Mean CD duration was 10.0 years, with 54% of patients having had prior exposure to biologic therapy (i.e., TNF-α, vedolizumab). Patients with available data at baseline and Week 12 were included in the analyses, including SES-CD matched endoscopic segments (n=60) and CDAI (n=59). SES-CD score reductions of ≥25% and ≥50% from baseline were seen in 43.3% and 26.7% of patients, respectively. Patients with less endoscopic disease activity (baseline SES-CD ≤12) had a greater endoscopic response, with 50.0% of patients and 35.7% having a reduction of ≥25% and ≥50%, respectively. In line with the improvements in SES-CD, reductions in mean CDAI scores from baseline were seen as early as Week 4 (first post-baseline assessment) with further reductions through Week 12. CDAI response (CDAI decrease ≥100) was demonstrated in 66% of patients, and CDAI remission (CDAI < 150) was demonstrated in 46% of patients, with a mean reduction at Week 12 of 130 points. Adverse event (AE) and serious AE rates appeared to be related to underlying moderate to severe CD. The overall safety profile in CD was similar to that observed in UC. Conclusion: Oral ozanimod demonstrated meaningful clinical improvements as early as Week 4 and endoscopic improvements at Week 12 in patients with moderate to severe CD. No new safety signals were identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→