MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911534628 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.962

On the unsteady characteristics of turbulent separations over a forward–backward-facing step

2019· article· en· W2911534628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsTurbulenceBubblePhysicsFlappingReynolds numberSeparation (statistics)Boundary layerFlow separationParticle image velocimetryWakeInstabilityOpticsWingThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbulent separation bubbles over and behind a two-dimensional forward–backward-facing step submerged in a deep turbulent boundary layer are investigated using a time-resolved particle image velocimetry. The Reynolds number based on the step height and free-stream velocity is 12 300, and the ratio of the streamwise length to the height of the step is 2.36. The upstream turbulent boundary layer thickness is 4.8 times the step height to ensure a strong interaction of the upstream turbulence structures with the separated shear layers over and behind the step. The velocity measurements were performed in streamwise–vertical planes at the channel mid-span and streamwise–spanwise planes at various vertical distances from the wall. The unsteady characteristics of the separation bubbles and their associated turbulence structures are studied using a variety of techniques including linear stochastic estimation, proper orthogonal decomposition and variable-interval time averaging. The results indicate that the low-frequency flapping motion of the separation bubble over the step is induced by the oncoming large-scale alternating low- and high-velocity streaky structures. Dual separation bubbles appear periodically over the step at a higher frequency than the flapping motion, and are attributed to the inherent instability in the rear part of the mean separation bubble. The separation bubble behind the step exhibits a flapping motion at the same frequency as the separation bubble over the step, but with a distinct phase delay. At instances when an enlarged separation bubble is formed in front of the step, a pair of vertical counter-rotating vortices is formed in the immediate vicinity of the leading edge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it