Melatonin protects against COPD by attenuating apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress via upregulating SIRT1 expression in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The apoptosis of bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells plays a key role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induced by cigarette smoke contributes to apoptosis. Previous studies demonstrated that melatonin prevented the development of COPD. In addition, silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) had a protective effect against COPD. However, it remains unclear whether SIRT1 is involved in the protection of melatonin against COPD. In this study, 32 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups: Control, COPD, COPD + Mel, and COPD + Mel + EX527. Rats were challenged with cigarette smoke and lipopolysaccharide with or without melatonin or EX527 (a selective inhibitor of SIRT1). The lung histopathology, apoptotic index, as well as the protein expressions of cleaved caspase-3, SIRT1, C/EBP homologous protein, and caspase-12 in the lung tissues were measured. These results demonstrated that melatonin attenuated apoptosis and ER stress in the lung tissues of rats with COPD. In addition, melatonin increased SIRT1 expression in lung tissues of rats with COPD, while inhibition of SIRT1 by EX527 upregulated ER stress and abolished the protective effect of melatonin against apoptosis. In conclusion, these findings suggested that melatonin protected against COPD by attenuating apoptosis and ER stress via upregulating SIRT1 expression in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".