Abstract O.71: Thrombosis and Thromboprophylaxis for Patients with Giant Coronary Artery Aneurysms after Kawasaki Disease: A Study from the North American Kawasaki Disease Registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Children with giant coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) after Kawasaki disease (KD) are at substantial risk of thrombosis. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for optimal thromboprophylactic therapy in these children. Methods: The North American Kawasaki Disease Registry was queried to identify all patients with giant CAA (maximum coronary artery z-score >10) and their antithrombotic therapy. Freedom from thrombosis was modelled using the Kaplan-Meier method; thrombotic complication rate was calculated per patient-year/month of follow-up. Results: n=202 patients with giant CAA were included, of whom 28 (14%) experienced either coronary artery thrombosis with or without myocardial infarction. Freedom from thrombotic complications was 92%, 85% and 79% at 3 months, 5 and 10 years after diagnosis, respectively. Non-pharmacological factors associated with increased risk of thrombotic complications included higher maximum coronary artery z-scores (HR: 1.7/+10 SD, p<0.001), higher number of coronary artery branches with giant CAA (HR: 2.6/branch, p<0.001), higher number of discrete CAA (HR: 1.4/aneurysm, p=0.001) and presence of complex CAA (involving the bifurcation or non-discrete; HR: 3.0, p=0.05). A total of 982 patient-years of follow-up were available for analysis (11% low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), 32% warfarin, 57% antiplatelet alone). All patients were maintained on ASA, with 47 patients (23%) also receiving clopidogrel. Patients while on LMWH had the highest event rate, at 1 event per 13 patient-years, compared to 1 per 39 on warfarin and 1 per 33 on no anticoagulant. However, LMWH was predominantly prescribed immediately after the acute phase, which is also the highest risk phase for thrombosis. When limiting analysis to events within 3 months of the acute phase, patients on LMWH had the lowest event rate at 1 per 46 patient-months, compared to 1 per 27 on warfarin and 1 per 33 on no anticoagulant (p=NS). Conclusions: Current thromboprophylaxis strategies in patients with giant CAA have suboptimal efficacy, and residual thrombosis risk persists. New anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents should be assessed in this population to determine if they provide better, safer and more tolerable thromboprophylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".