MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911641194 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2018.8638116

FCTree: A Space Efficient FIB Data Structure for NDN Routers

2018· article· en· W2911641194 on OpenAlexaff
Ouassim Karrakchou, Nancy Samaan, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBloom filterRouterComputer networkHash functionRouting tableLatency (audio)Data structurePrefixHash tableRouting protocolDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Named Data Networking (NDN) is a future Internet architecture that replaces IP addresses with namespaces of contents that are searchable at the network layer. A challenging task for NDN routers is to manage forwarding-information bases (FIBs) that store next-hop routes to contents using their stored usually long names or name prefixes. In this paper, we propose FCTree, a compressed FIB data structure that significantly reduces the required storage space at the router and can efficiently meet the demands of having routes that are orders of magnitude larger than IP-based ones in conventional routing tables. FCTree employs a localized front-coding compression to buckets containing partitions of the routes. The top routes in these buckets are then organized in B-ary self-balancing trees. By adjusting the size of the buckets, the router can reach an optimal tradeoff between the latency of the longest prefix matching (LPM) operation and the FIB storage space. In addition, in contrast to existing hash and bloom-filter based solutions, the proposed FCTree structure can significantly reduce the latency required for range and wildcard searches (e.g., for latency sensitive streaming applications or network-layer search engines) where up to k routes are returned if they are prefixed by a requested name. Performance evaluation results demonstrate the significant space savings achieved by FCTree compared to traditional hash-based FIBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207