MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911684153 · doi:10.1002/app.47578

Multifunctional CO<sub>2</sub>‐switchable polymers for the flocculation of oil sands tailings

2019· article· en· W2911684153 on OpenAlexaff
Atreya K. Nittala, Sarang P. Gumfekar, João B. P. Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlocculationMethacrylateCopolymerPolymerChemical engineeringPolymerizationPolymer chemistryTailingsPolyacrylamideMaterials scienceRadical polymerizationAqueous solutionChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A series of multifunctional homopolymer and copolymer of 2‐dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) and N ‐isopropyl acrylamide (NIPAM) were designed and used to flocculate oil sands mature fine tailings (MFTs). Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) protonated the tertiary amine groups of P(DMAEMA) and P(DMAEMA–NIPAM) making their chains positively charged. The pH sensitivity of these polymers favored the flocculation of the negatively charged clays in MFT due to charge neutralization. Three different polymers, P(DMAEMA), P(NIPAM 33 –DMAEMA 67 ), and P(NIPAM 67 –DMAEMA 33 ) were synthesized via aqueous free‐radical polymerization and used to flocculate MFT in the presence of CO 2 . Experimentally, CO 2 was introduced in the system in three different ways: (1) CO 2 was first bubbled into polymer solution, then the polymer solution was added to MFT, (2) CO 2 was first bubbled into MFT and then the CO 2 ‐free polymer solution was added to MFT, and (3) both polymers and MFT were bubbled with CO 2 separately, then mixed together. We compared the effects of the method of CO 2 addition, copolymer composition, and polymer molecular weight on MFT flocculation performance. Our results indicate that CO 2 ‐switchable polymers can be employed to enhance the dewatering of challenging wastewaters such as oil sands tailings. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019 , 136 , 47578.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207