MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Structure and Stability of Premixed Swirl-Stabilized CH<sub>4</sub>/O<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> Flames in a Model Gas Turbine Combustor

2019· article· en· W2911715613 on OpenAlex
Medhat A. Nemitallah, Ahmed Abdelhafez, Mohamed A. Habib

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsCombustorFlashbackCombustionConical surfacePremixed flameEquivalence ratioMechanicsMaterials scienceFlame structureChemistryMethaneAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsPhysical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premixed CH4/O2/CO2 flames were studied experimentally and numerically in a swirl-stabilized combustor. The bulk throat velocity of the incoming combustible mixture was maintained constant at 5.2 m/s. The oxygen fraction of the O2/CO2 oxidizer was kept constant at 60 vol %, while the effect of the equivalence ratio was examined from the blowout limit to the flashback one. The LES computational model was successfully validated through comparisons with experimental data in terms of axial and radial temperature profiles, as well as predicted OH* concentration maps versus visual flame appearance. Three different flame structures were observed while varying the equivalence ratio, namely, (I) double conical flame, (II) corner-stabilized flame, and (III) swirl-stabilized (V-shaped) flame. The double conical flame is observed at low equivalence ratios near the blowout limit. This flame stabilizes within both the inner and outer shear layers and has two distinct reaction zones with two inner recirculation zones (IRZs) separated by a colder, reaction-free corner recirculation zone (CRZ). The corner-stabilized flame is observed at higher equivalence ratios. The downstream reaction zone diminishes and merges with the upstream one to form a flame that stabilizes within a reacting CRZ. Increasing the equivalence ratio further induces a transition to the typical V-shape of swirl-stabilized flames with significantly stronger IRZ and weaker CRZ. This flame is thus stabilized by its IRZ. The V-shape prevails until flashback occurs when the hot reaction zone moves closest to the burner throat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it