MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911728756

PENGARUH PERTUMBUHAN DPK, BI RATE, INFLASI, IPITERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN KREDIT PADA BANK PEMERINTAH

2017· dissertation· id· W2911728756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wahidatul Awalia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflation (cosmology)Industrial production indexIndex (typography)Quarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsVariablesMonetary economicsProduction (economics)Government (linguistics)Financial systemInterest rateBusinessMacroeconomicsStatisticsMathematicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research are to know the influence of variableare savings, deposit, demand deposit, BI rate, Inflation and the industrial production index to credit growth of government banks simultaneously and partially.The samples of this r esearch is government banks. Data in this research used secondary data and collecting menthod in this research used documentation method. The data are taken from published financial report of government banks begun from first quarter at year 2011 until sec ond quarter at year 2016. The technique of data analysis used multiple linier regression analysis.The result research show the growth of savings variable have a significant positive effect,the growth of deposit has not a significant negative effect,the gro wth of demand deposit, inflation, growth of industrial production index has not a significant positive effect, BI rate has not significant negative effect. Keyword :The growth of third party fund, BI rate, the growth of Inflation, the growth of industrial production index, Credit growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207