Impaired antigen‐specific lymphocyte priming in mice after Toll‐like receptor 4 activation via induction of monocytic myeloid‐derived suppressor cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In sepsis, the pathology involves a shift from a proinflammatory state toward an immunosuppressive phase. We previously showed that an agonistic anti‐TLR4 antibody induced long‐term endotoxin tolerance and suppressed antigen‐specific secondary IgG production when primed prior to immunization with antigen. These findings led us to speculate that TLR4‐induced innate tolerance due to primary infection causes an immunosuppressive pathology in sepsis. Therefore, the mechanism underlying impaired antigen‐specific humoral immunity by the TLR4 antibody was investigated. We showed, in a mouse model, that primary antigen‐specific IgG responses were impaired in TLR4 antibody‐induced tolerized mice, which was the result of reduced numbers of antigen‐specific GC B cells and plasma cells. Ovalbumin‐specific CD4 and CD8 T‐cell responses were impaired in TLR4 antibody‐injected OT‐I and ‐II transgenic mice ex vivo. Adoptive transfer studies demonstrated suppression of OVA‐specific CD4 and CD8 T‐cell responses by the TLR4 antibody in vivo. The TLR4 antibody induced Gr1 + CD11b + myeloid‐derived suppressor cell (MDSC) expansion with suppression of T‐cell activation. Monocytic MDSCs were more suppressive and exhibited higher expression of PD‐L1 and inducible nitric oxidase compared with granulocytic MDSCs. In conclusion, immune tolerance conferred by TLR4 activation induces the expansion of monocytic MDSCs, which impairs antigen‐specific T‐cell priming and IgG production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".