Length of uninterrupted CAG repeats, independent of polyglutamine size, results in increased somatic instability and hastened age of onset in Huntington disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Huntington disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder that is caused by a CAG repeat expansion, translated into polyglutamine, in the huntingtin ( HTT) gene. Although the length of this repeat polymorphism is inversely correlated with age of onset (AOO), it does not fully explain the variability in AOO. Genomic studies have provided evidence for the involvement of DNA repair in modifying this trait, potentially through somatic repeat instability. We therefore assessed genetic variants within the 12bp interrupting sequence between the pathogenic CAG repeat and the polymorphic proline (CCG) tract in the HTT gene and identified variants that result in complete loss of interruption (LOI) between the adjacent CAG/CCG repeats. Analysis of multiple HD pedigrees showed that this variant is associated with dramatically earlier AOO and is particularly relevant to HD patients with reduced penetrance alleles. On average AOO of HD is hastened by an average of 25 years in LOI carriers. This finding indicates that the number of uninterrupted CAG repeats is the most significant contributor to AOO of HD and is more impactful than polyglutamine length, which is not altered in these patients. We show that the LOI variant is associated with increases in both somatic and germline repeat instability, demonstrating a potential mechanism for this effect. Screening individuals from the general population ( n =2,674 alleles) suggests that the variant occurs only in expanded CAG repeat alleles. Identification of this modifier has important clinical implications for disease management of HD families, especially for those in the reduced penetrance ranges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".