MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911901153 · doi:10.12957/rmi.2018.36079

Latin American Regionalism in the XXI Century: An Ongoing Interactive Game of Resistance and Cooperation | El regionalismo latinoamericano en el siglo XXI: un juego interactivo de resistencia y cooperación

2018· article· es· W2911901153 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Giacalone

Bibliographic record

VenueMural Internacional · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegionalism (politics)Latin AmericansPolitical scienceHumanitiesResistance (ecology)PoliticsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resistance and cooperation were at the center of Latin American regionalism along the XXI century developing an interactive game among governments and regional agreements that is still going on. Though threats posed by the international system influenced the game, this article looks at how peripheral nations react to actions of other peripheral nations rather than to actions of central powers. We identify the main factors behind neighbours’ resistance to regionalism, place them in an interactive study of Latin American regionalism (2000-2018), and discuss how regional actors’ decisions influence other actors’ future decisions, combining game theory and discourse analysis . Our aim is to contribute supporting arguments to the literature that stresses actorness (agency) by developing nations . RESUMEN Se argumenta que en el siglo XXI resistencia y cooperación fueron el eje central de la interacción entre acuerdos regionales latinoamericanos y contribuyeron a impulsar un juego interactivo entre ellos. Aunque las amenazas del contexto internacional ejercieron influencia en el juego, se analiza cómo naciones periféricas latinoamericanas reaccionaron a acciones de otras naciones periféricas de su región antes que a las de naciones desarrolladas. Primero, se identifica los factores detrás de la resistencia de sus vecinos a distintos acuerdos regionales, luego se los ubica en un estudio longitudinal de la interacción entre ellos (2000-2018) y se discute de qué forma las decisiones tomadas dentro de un acuerdo influyeron sobre las decisiones de otros actores regionales, combinando teoría del juego y análisis del discurso. El artículo aporta argumentos a la literatura que enfatiza la agencia de las naciones en desarrollo en las Relaciones Internacionales. Keywords: Regionalism; interactive game; Latin America Palabras clave: regionalismo; juego interactivo; América Latina Recebido em 16 de Julho de 2018 | Received on July 16, 2018 Aceito em 6 de Outubro de 2018 | Accepted on Octubre 6, 2018 DOI: 10.12957/rmi.2018.36079

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMural InternacionalSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207