Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to Memphis, Tennessee, for the 40th Annual SIGUCCS Management Symposium. As many of you know, this is the second year of the combined SIGUCCS conference. The Management Symposium was typically held in the spring and the Service and Support conference in the fall. Last year's first combined conference (in San Diego) was a huge success and really set the bar high for future conference committees. This year, we promise you a great experience at both the Management Symposium and the Service and Support conference and feel confident you will come away with many new ideas, solid networking opportunities as well as an overall good time. We have an excellent program in store for you. Sue Workman, Associate Vice President for Client Services and Support at Indiana University will open the Symposium (Monday) by discussing a topic that is a daily struggle for most of us -- implementing change through the effective collaboration of groups within higher education. The opening keynote will transition into break out sessions that are made up of three tracks: Leadership, Partnerships and Professional Development; Resource Planning and Fiscal Management; and Technology Management. The break out sessions in the Management Symposium are designed to be Facilitated Discussions whereas the presenter will present an idea or topic and leave a significant amount of time for discussion with/among the audience. Similar to last year, on Tuesday, the program committee will be leading a Plenary session entitled Current Topics Exchange where attendees will have the opportunity to move from table to table (every 20 minutes) to discuss popular IT topics that have an impact on higher education. Each table will have a moderator that will guide you through a discussion with your peers about problems, successes and failures relating to the table topic. On Wednesday, the Management Symposium will transition to the Service and Support Conference with a Joint Plenary delivered by Jim Sevier from Convergence Readiness Incorporated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.319 | 0.194 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".