MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912001981 · doi:10.1107/s010876731809877x

Structural characterization of the <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> peptidyl-prolyl <i>cis</i>,<i>trans</i>-isomerase HP0175 reveals an extension of chaperone helices upon target interaction

2018· article· en· W2912001981 on OpenAlexaff
Ayat Yaseen, Gerald F. Audette

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomeraseHelicobacter pyloriChaperone (clinical)ChemistryStereochemistryBiochemistryCrystallographyBiologyGeneticsEnzymeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within a host, pathogenic bacteria employ several mechanisms that enhance their survival and motility. Helicobacter pylori secretes several virulence factors, including VacA, CagA, -glutamyltrasnpeptidase and HP0175. The secreted HP0175 has been shown to induce cell apoptosis through a cascade of mechanisms initiated through binding to Toll Like Receptor 4 (TLR4). HP0175 is classified as a parvulin-like peptidylprolyl cis,trans-isomerase (PPIase) involved in the isomerization of proline-containing peptide bonds. We have crystallized apo-HP0175 and determined the structure to 2.09 resolution. A comparison to the indole-2-carboxylic acid bound HP0175 form of the protein reveals that the N-and C-terminal helices of the chaperone domain extend upon engagement of the catalytic residues in the binding pocket by the inhibitor. Further, chromatographic and mass spectrometric analysis of HP0175 reveals that dimerization of the active form of the protein is dependent on ionic strength. These structural observations support the finding in other parvulins that the N-and C-terminal helices stabilize proteins undergoing catalysis by the PPIase domain, as well as suggest a means by which HP0175 could bind to TLR4, thereby initiating an apoptotic cascade in infected cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207