MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912034821 · doi:10.4095/313562

Applications of borehole geophysical logs in groundwater studies

2019· report· en· W2912034821 on OpenAlex
H Crow, A K Burt, R D Knight, R P M Mulligan, A J -M Pugin, H A J Russell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGeologyGroundwaterGeophysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 5-year program cycle, the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) has completed downhole geophysical logging to i) support regional stratigraphic studies, ii) conduct velocity analyses for seismic reflection surveys, iii) support hydrogeophysics studies, iv) adopt new methodologies, and v) maintain a national calibration facility. The geophysical logs provide in situ information on physical and chemical properties of sediment and rock, and of borehole fluid parameters to support groundwater studies through improved lithological characterization. Using examples from different project settings across southern and eastern Ontario, the benefits of an integrated approach to geophysical, geological, geochemical, and hydrogeological datasets will be discussed. In collaboration with the Ontario Geological Survey's 3D Quaternary sediment mapping projects in Southern Ontario, the GSC collected geophysical logs in 20 cored boreholes in the Niagara and central Simcoe County regions. The integration of sediment core examination with geophysical logs supported an enhanced understanding of local complex geological processes. While significant changes in log responses at key stratigraphic boundaries helped to distinguish potentially water-bearing coarse-grained units from fine-grained aquitards, logs yielded equally useful information about subtle changes in grain sizes, mineralogy, and velocity structure related to depositional conditions. At two sites east of Toronto, geophysical logs were interpreted together with chemostratigraphic data to identify geochemical changes in the sediment column. Elemental variations were well aligned with geophysical log responses and changes in grain size. Geophysical logs also identified non-chemical changes in sediment, such as variations in porosity/density, or pore fluid chemistry, providing highly complementary datasets for detailed litho-stratigraphic analyses. Over the past few years, new technologies have been applied in GSC bedrock and sediment calibration boreholes. The use of a GSC-developed controlled frequency vibratory source is allowing for selection of source parameters fine-tuned for different geological settings. This is showing great potential for high-resolution downhole velocity testing, supporting optimized reflection seismic velocity conversions. An experimental deployment of slim-hole borehole magnetic resonance (BMR) tools in calibration holes around Ottawa was conducted in bedrock and post-glacial sediments. These instruments are designed to measure formation porosity and pore size distribution without the use of radioactive sources. Although the influence of magnetite-bearing minerals from Shield-derived sediments is a topic of ongoing study, early qualitative results from the tests are encouraging. The evaluation of new tools using calibration datasets is an important driver for the ongoing work to update geophysical calibration facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207