MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2912046435 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wp564

Abstract WP564: Deep Immune Profiling of the Post-Stroke Peripheral Immune Response Reveals Tri-phasic Response and Correlations With Long-Term Cognitive Outcomes

2019· article· en· W2912046435 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amy S. Tsai, Maxime Beneyto, Dyani Gaudillière, Edward A. Ganio, Benjamin Choisy, Karim Djebali, Quentin Baca, Lisa N. Quach, Lauren L. Drag, Maarten G. Lansberg, Martin S. Angst, Brice Gaudillière, Marion S. Buckwalter, Nima Aghaeepour

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemMedicineStroke (engine)ImmunologyAcquired immune systemImmunosenescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Stroke produces profound local and systemic immune responses that engage all major innate and adaptive immune compartments. The aim of this study was to characterize the systemic immune response to stroke and to determine if it contributes to long-term cognitive disability. Methods: We included 24 consecutive subjects with ischemic stroke and excluded patients for autoimmune disorders, use of immunosuppressant drugs, or life expectancy <90 days. Blood samples were collected for up to 9 timepoints after stroke (days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 30, 90, and 365). Change in cognitive function between days 90 and 365 was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Control samples were from a cohort of 24 sex- and age-matched patients prior to hip replacement surgery. We used mass cytometry to acquire 240 immune features from each sample, representing 20 immune cell subtypes, their frequency, cell surface markers, and activation states. Elastic Net (EN) regularized regression modeling was used to characterize phases of the immune response and to correlate stages of the immune response with change in cognitive function. Results: The EN model identified three distinct phases of the systemic immune response to ischemic stroke: The acute phase (day 2) was characterized by increased STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) signaling responses in innate immune cell types. The intermediate phase (day 5) was characterized by increased CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) signaling responses in adaptive immune cell types. The late phase (day 90) was characterized by persistent elevation of neutrophils and IgM+ B cells. By day 365 there was a return to baseline immune responses, comparable to the controls. A decline in MoCA scores between day 90 and day 365 after stroke correlated with a stronger inflammatory response in the acute phase (r = -0.692, Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.04). Conclusions: The results demonstrate three distinct phases of the peripheral immune response that occur after stroke, spanning from days 2 to day 90. The acute phase immune response predicts post-stroke cognitive decline, suggesting that therapies aimed at optimizing this response could lead to preservation of cognitive functioning post-stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→