MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912109461 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.tp559

Abstract TP559: Sulforaphane Confers Neuroprotection Against Neuronal Loss, White Matter Injury and BBB Damage Following Experimental Vascular Cognitive Impairment

2019· article· en· W2912109461 on OpenAlexaff
Leilei Mao, Tuo Yang, Cong Li, Feng Zhang, Baoliang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroprotectionMedicineWhite matterSulforaphaneCorpus callosumHippocampal formationMyelinNeurosciencePharmacologyPathologyInternal medicineCentral nervous systemMagnetic resonance imagingCancer researchBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sulforaphane reduces brain injury following experimental vascular cognitive impairment by activating Nrf2 pathway Aims: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is a type of dementia, and its major pathophysiological process is chronic ischemia, leading to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disintegration, neuronal death, and white matter injury. The aim of current study is to test whether sulforaphane (Sfn), a natural activator of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), protects the brain against chronic ischemic injury and improve cognitive function after experiment VCI. Results: VCI was induced in rats by permanent occlusion of both common carotid arteries, which caused remarkable cognitive impairment, accompanied by neuronal death in the cortex and hippocampal CA1, demyelination in the corpus callosum and hippocampal fimbria, and accumulation of myelin debris in the corpus callosum. Sfn alleviated the cognitive impairment and reduced these accompanying pathophysiological changes. Sfn neuroprotection was associated with enhanced Nrf2 activation. In vitro, Sfn reduced neuronal and endothelial death, maintained the integrity of the BBB after oxygen-glucose deprivation; and Nrf2 knockdown with shRNA significantly reduced the protection of Sfn. Furthermore, Nrf2 knockdown in endothelial cells decreased the level of claudin-5, a tight junction protein; and luciferase assay suggested that claudin-5 might be a downstream target of Nrf2. Innovation: This is the first study demonstrates the neuroprotective effects of Sfn against neuronal loss, white matter injury, and BBB damage after VCI. Furthermore, it discovers the accumulated myelin debris in WM and that Nrf2 may control the expression of claudin-5. Conclusion: Our results suggest that Sfn provides comprehensive protection to the brain and may be a promising agent targeting cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207