MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912113156

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emerging Multimedia Applications and Services for Smart Cities

2014· article· en· W2912113156 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Anwar Hossain, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIBMCorporationSmart cityTelecommunicationsComputer scienceMultimediaBusinessWorld Wide WebInternet of Things
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are delighted to welcome you to the 2014 ACM MM Workshop on Emerging Multimedia Applications and Services for Smart Cities -- EMASC'14. This is the first workshop we organize on the emerging concept of smart cities. We aim this workshop to be a premier forum to report on the state-of-the-art techniques, methodologies, multimedia applications, and services relevant to smart city. The mission of the workshop is to address the many challenges that arise from the proliferation of multimedia, sensors, pervasive devices, and integrated infrastructure for realizing smart city. Addressing these challenges would contribute to improve the quality of life of smart city citizens in many aspects including public safety, healthcare, transportation, or energy. Our call for papers attracted many submissions from Taiwan, Finland, Italy, Qatar, United States, Canada, Iran, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. The program committee reviewed 17 full length technical papers and accepted 6 of them, having an acceptance ratio of 35%. We also invited two keynote speakers who are actively involved in IBM smart cities movement. We therefore encourage all attendees to attend the keynote presentations. These presentations will provide us valuable insights about the current status and future trends of smart cities movement in both the industry and the academia. The two keynote speeches are: Human Surrogates: Remote Presence for Collaboration and Education in Smart Cities by Charles Hughes, PhD (Professor, Computer Science, University of Central Florida, USA) Industrial and Business Systems for Smart Cities by Ben Amaba, PhD (PE, CPIM®, LEED® AP BD+C, IBM Corporation Worldwide Executive, Miami, Florida USA)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207