MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912199117 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899169

A Novel Outlier Immune Multipath Fingerprinting Model for Indoor Single-Site Localization

2019· article· en· W2912199117 on OpenAlexaff
Limin Chen, Xionghui Yang, Peter Liu, Chunquan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersJiangxi Provincial Department of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceOutlierPattern recognition (psychology)Multipath propagationArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multipath fingerprinting is a promising indoor location technique, which contains abundant position features of the received array signals. Effectively representing the position information is one critical issue in fingerprinting localization. Meanwhile, positional accuracy is prone to reduction caused by abnormal measurement readings, which are referred to as outliers, and it has received a little attention in the existing literature. A multipath fingerprinting model for indoor single-site localization is proposed. In this model, the location fingerprint is composed of the spatial-temporal covariance matrix of the multipath signals received by the base station antenna array. The low-dimensional linear subspace of the location fingerprinting is introduced as feature descriptors. Based on the fact that the Grassmann manifold maintains the orthogonality of the linear subspace, the Binet-Cauchy kernel is employed to map the multipath fingerprinting to a higher dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert space. The Euclidean distance of the nearest point between multipath fingerprinting affine hulls is adopted to represent the similarity of the position. Moreover, an augmented Lagrangian and alternating direction solution is given to remove the influence of outliers. We extensively evaluated the proposed method with the indoor multi-scenario benchmark data set. All the results demonstrate that the location accuracy of the proposed positioning model outperforms the existing method in an indoor environment. As the proportion of outliers increases, the positional accuracy loss of the proposed model is negligible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207