MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2912273723 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.176

Abstract 176: To Stay or to Go? Utilization of a Mobile Interventional Stroke Team Shortens Time to Treatment in Large Vessel Occlusion

2019· article· en· W2912273723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lili Velickovic Ostojic, Maryna Skliut, Johanna T Fifi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)ThrombolysisEmergency medicineModified Rankin ScaleOcclusionSurgeryMyocardial infarctionIschemic strokeInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To compare outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting to a single primary stroke center (PSC). MT was performed either by a mobile interventional stroke team (MIST) on site or after interhospital transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Background: MT has become standard of care in acute LVO. A majority of hospitals cannot perform MT on site, requiring patient transfer to a thrombectomy-capable center. Within a metropolitan multihospital health care system, utilization of a MIST shortens time to intervention, potentially leading to better outcomes and decreased cost of care. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all acute LVOs presenting to a PSC in Manhattan, NY, from September 2013 to February 2018. We selected patients who underwent MT on site or after transfer to a CSC. Outcomes were assessed by Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days. Results: MT was performed in 48 patients by one endovascular team; 37 patients for whom all data was available were selected for analysis. 28 MTs were performed on site by a MIST (group 1), and 9 patients were transferred to a CSC for intervention (group 2). Median age was 74.5 and 73 years respectively. In group 1, median NIHSS on presentation was 18 and median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9, compared to 17 and 10 respectively in group 2. Median door-to-puncture (DTP) time was 144.5 minutes and 233 minutes respectively (p<0.05). In group 1, 82% had baseline mRS 0-2 (functional independence), compared to 36% at 90 days. In group 2, 100% had baseline mRS 0-2, and 22% at 90 days. TICI ≥2B was achieved in 89% in both groups. In group 1, 50% had complete reperfusion (TICI 3), compared to 11% in group 2. Conclusion: DTP times were significantly shorter in patients treated by a MIST. This group also had better reperfusion grades and a higher rate of functional independence, although statistical significance was not reached. Even though our study is limited by a small number of cases, the data indicates that in certain geographic areas, the utilization of a MIST may be associated with better outcomes in patients with stroke due to LVO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→