MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912337712 · doi:10.1353/ces.2019.0000

Moving Us Nowhere: The Politics of Emotion and Civility in the Wake of the Quebec City Massacre

2019· article· en· W2912337712 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Philip S. S. Howard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFriedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance
KeywordsCivilitySolidarityPoliticsSociologyRacismMemorializationGender studiesIncivilityMedia studiesSocial psychologyPolitical sciencePsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article critically examines responses to the 2017 Quebec City Mosque massacre as expressed in a letter written to the public by the killer's parents in January 2018, and various forms of media coverage related to the letter. While the letter attempts to communicate the parents' grief and to express solidarity with Muslims affected by the attack, this article argues that Islamophobic logic is evident throughout, maintained precisely through the emotionality of the letter and media responses, and through the apparently well-intentioned gestures of empathy and solidarity they represent. This analysis draws on theoretical literature that contextualizes the roles of emotion and civility in constructing and reinforcing racialized boundaries, and in shaping the lived experiences of Muslims in Quebec and Canada. By further considering statements and responses from the Quebec Muslim community, this analysis also briefly discusses the ways in which the emotionality displayed by the victims' families and community seeks to refocus the conversation back onto the ongoing problem of anti-Muslim racism in Quebec and Canada, calling for a deeper accountability around this pervasive issue. Résumé: Cet article examine de manière critique les réactions à l'attentat de 2017 contre la grande mosquée de Québec, telles qu'exprimées dans une lettre écrite au public par les parents du meurtrier en janvier 2018, ainsi que sous diverses formes de couverture médiatique liée à la lettre. Alors que la lettre tente de communiquer le chagrin des parents et d'exprimer leur solidarité avec les musulmans touchés par cet attentat, cet article affirme qu'une logique islamophobe est évidente, maintenue précisément par l'émotivité de la lettre et de la couverture médiatique, ainsi que par les gestes bien intentionnées d'empathie et de solidarité qu'ils représentent. Cette analyse s'appuie sur une littérature théorique qui contextualise les rôles de l'émotion et de la civilité dans la construction et le renforcement de frontières raciales et dans la façonnement des expériences vécues par les musulmans au Québec et au Canada. En outre, en prenant en compte les déclarations et les réponses de la communauté musulmane à Québec, cette analyse aborde également brièvement la manière dont l'émotivité manifestée par les familles et la communauté des victimes cherche à recentrer le débat sur le problème actuel du racisme antimusulman au Québec et au Canada, et à insister sur une responsabilisation plus profonde autour de cette question omniprésente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207