MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Patient and Physician Perceptions on Living with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Two Internet Surveys

2007· article· en· W2912429381 on OpenAlexaff
David T. Rubin, Corey A. Siegel, Sunanda V. Kane, David G. Binion, Remo Panaccione, Marla C. Dubinsky, Joseph Hopper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)PopulationColectomyDiseaseFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table: Incidence of Renal Insufficiency and Leukopenia with 5-ASA MedicationsPurpose: To understand how the perception of the impact of ulcerative colitis (UC) on patients’ lives differs between patients and gastroenterologists. Methods: Two national internet surveys were conducted: one in patients with UC and one in gastroenterologists. Here we present selected results from these surveys. Patients with a history of colectomy were excluded. Results: 451 patients with UC (20% mild, 63% moderate, 13% severe [as informed by their physician]) and 300 gastroenterologists (unassociated with the patients) were included in the surveys. In total, 36% of patients reported having ≥6 flares per year (subjective self-definition). This number exceeded gastroenterologists’ expectations for a patient population with this distribution of disease severities. When patients were asked what being in remission meant to them, 44% believed it meant living with UC symptoms, but managing life without interruption. Although ∼55% of patients reported being prescribed 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy, the gastroenterologists reported prescribing 5-ASA therapy to 87% of their patients. Both patients and gastroenterologists reported that managing UC medication is a struggle for patients (49 and 41%) and that it is difficult for patients to take medication as prescribed every day (42 and 90%). Indeed, 46% of patients admitted to not taking all of their medication in the past week, while gastroenterologists believed that 41% of their patients were not adherent. Conclusion: These surveys show important disparities between how patients and gastroenterologists perceive the impact of living with UC. Results suggest that many patients have adapted to live with their symptoms rather than acting to optimize therapy and compliance. Improvements in management strategies, education, and communication among patients and gastroenterologists are necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→