MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 17186: Regional Extracellular Volume Fraction Can Identify Cardiac Muscle Changes in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

2015· article· en· W2912443702 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Olivieri, Peter Kellman, R. J. Cross, Kanishka Ratnayaka, Michael Stormly Hansen, Chris Spurney

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsOlivieri Foods
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuchenne muscular dystrophyEjection fractionCardiologyInternal medicineCardiomyopathyMagnetic resonance imagingMuscular dystrophyDilated cardiomyopathyCardiac magnetic resonance imagingHeart failureRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked inherited disorder causing dilated cardiomyopathy with variable onset and progression. Our aim was to compare native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in boys with DMD to controls to identify markers of preclinical myocardial disease. Methods: With IRB approval and informed consent/assent, 17 boys with DMD had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast. Ejection fraction (EF), presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), native T1, and ECV mapping were obtained using a modified Look-Locker sequence on a 1.5T MR scanner (Figure 1). Results were compared with age and gender matched controls with no history predisposing to cardiac fibrosis (i.e. bypass, myocarditis, etc). Results: Seventeen DMD subjects (age 14 ± 5 years; EF 56% ± 8%) were compared with 13 normal controls (age 17 ± 4 years) with normal EF and no LGE. DMD subjects had low-normal EF (average EF 56% ± 8%) and 10 of 17 (59%) had evidence of LGE, all in the lateral location. Comparing native T1 in DMD vs controls, septal native T1 was 1060 ± 71 ms versus 990 ± 34 ms (p < 0.01) and lateral native T1 was 1090 ± 93 versus 978 ± 37 ms, respectively (p < 0.01). Comparing ECV values in DMD vs controls, septal ECV was 29.6 ± 7.8 and 25.9 ± 3.4 (p = 0.03) and lateral ECV was 32.7 ± 8.7 and 24.4 ±3.6 (p < 0.01), respectively. All DMD patients with abnormal EF and/or presence of LGE also had higher ECV values. Conclusions: ECV is strongly-related to DMD and differs significantly compared to normals, particularly in the lateral wall. ECV mapping may be a useful technique for identifying preclinical myocardial changes in DMD. Figure 1. A) Precontrast T1 map, B) post contrast T1 map and C) ECV map with scale on the right in the short axis projection of a boy with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arrows indicate elevated values laterally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→